Allahabad High Court
CRLA/3797/2025 of SANNA @ SANT SARAN Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 25 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3797 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant seeking following main
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3797 of 2025
Court No. - 13
HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
3
Decisions referred to
In this index
2
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record.
2. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant seeking following main relief(s):- "(1) To, allow the Appeal and Set aside the impugned order dated 07.11.2025 passed by the Learned Special Judge (SC & ST Act), Barabanki in Bail Application No. 3257/2025 relating to Case Crime No. 352 of 2025, under section 351(3), 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 352, 3(5) of B.N.S (Corresponding Sections 506, 307, 323, 324, 504, 34 of IPC) and section 3(1)(Da), 3(1)(Dha), 3(2)(v) of SC & ST Act (Sanna @ Sant Saran Vs. State of U.P.) lodged at Police Station - Jaidpur, District -Barabanki, by which the Anticipatory Bail Application moved by the Appellant has been rejected."
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that at this stage, he is confining his prayer to seek the benefit of the judgment(s) passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116 for which liberty may be given to the appellant and liberty may also be given to the appellant(s) to approach this Court again at appropriate stage for seeking appropriate relief.
4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the appellant.
5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present appeal is disposed of with liberty as prayed for.
6. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra) , this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today, they would not take any coercive action against the appellant in the aforesaid case. It is made clear that in this regard, no application shall be entertained. November 25, 2025 Arun/- Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Suresh Kumar Yadav, Poonam Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Sanna @ Sant Saran .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench