Central Government Industrial Tribunal
Sh. Dinesh Kumar vs Airport Authority of India & ors on 13 September 2024
THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL
CUM LABOUR COURT DELHI NO.1 NEW DELHI.
ID.No. 231/2017
Sh. Dinesh Kumar S/o Sh. Hira Lal,
Through Hindustan Engineering and General Mazdoor Union (Regd.)
D-2/24, Sultanpuri,
Delhi.
…..Workman
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. M/s Airport Authority of India, Rajiv Gandhi Bhawan, New Delhi- 110005.
2. M/s Spice Jet Ltd., Domestic Interstate Airport Terminated No.1 D, Palam Airport, New Delhi- 110037.
3. M/s Sun Shine Enterprises, 49, Ground Floor, Kailash Colony Metro Station Sant Nagar., New Delhi-110049. …….Management
AWARD
1. This is an application under Section 2-A of the I.D. Act whereby, the applicant made prayer that his termination from the service on 23.11.2014 by the management which be declare illegal and unjustified and he be reinstated with full back wages. He has not been provided any legal facilities. When the workman went to join his job he was illegally terminated form his service on 23.11.2014 without any rhyme or reason and without conducted any domestic enquiry by the management. He has initiated the conciliation proceeding but, no result. Hence, he had filed the present claim petition.
2. Management No.2 is not appearing since long therefore they are proceeded ex-parte. However, Management no.1&3 appeared and filed the rebuttal written statement. After that, rejoinder was filed and issues were framed. And after that, case was listed for claimant listed on 16.05.2024. Thereafter, the AR for the claimant informed that the claimant did not contact him for a long time. Also, the claimant is not appearing in the tribunal to substantiate his claim.
3. Hence, in these circumstances this tribunal has no option except to pass the no dispute award. No dispute award is passed accordingly. File is consigned to the record room. A copy of this award is hereby send to the appropriate government for notification under section 17 of the I.D. Act, 1947.
Let a copy of this Award be sent for publication as required under Section 17 of Act.
Justice Vikas Kunvar Srivastava Retired Judge, Allahabad High Court
Presiding Officer Date: 13.09.2024