Central Government Industrial Tribunal
Sh. Rajeev Singh vs IOCL & Anr on 10 September 2024
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT NO-II, NEW DELHI
ID.No. 24/2023
Sh. Rajveer Singh, S/o Sh. Kartar Singh, Through- Delhi Karamchari Sangh, W-04, In Front of Kalkaji Bus Depot, Govindpuri, New Delhi-110019.
VERSUS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The General Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., (Marketing Division) Brijwasan, New Delhi-110061.
2. Retd. Col. Sh. Rajan Kumar, (Proprietor) Raj Kumar Rajan Security Agency, Ground Floor-04, Competent House, Plot No. 07, R.B.C. Nagal Ray, New Delhi-110046.
Appearance: For Claimant: None For Managements: Sh. Navin Kumar, Ld. AR for M-1.
Sh. Gyanveer Singh, Ld. AR for M-2.
AWARD
The appropriate Government has sent the reference refer dated 12.01.2023 to this tribunal for adjudication in the following words:
“Whether demands of Sh. Rajveer Singh S/o Sh. Kartar Singh, Gun Man through Delhi Karamchari Sangh (Regd.) vide letter dated 08.06.2022 against the management of M/s Rajan Kumar Rajan Security Agency, New Delhi (Contractor) under Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Marketing Division, Bijwasan, New Delhi over the issue of alleged illegal termination of his services w.e.f. 01.05.2022 and reinstatement in service with all consequential benefits, are proper, legal and justified under ID Act, 1947? If yes, to what relief the disputant is entitled and what direction, if any, is necessary in the matter?” After receiving the said reference, notices were issued to both the parties. Managements have been appearing in each date of hearing but, the claimant has not been appearing since the reference has been received to this tribunal. Even, the claimant has not come forward to file his claim statement before this tribunal, despite, providing a number of opportunities.
In these circumstances, this tribunal has no option except to pass the no disputant award. Hence, no disputant award is passed. Award is passed accordingly. File is consigned to the record room. A copy of this award is sent to the appropriate government for notification under section 17 of the I.D Act 1947.
ATUL KUMAR GARG Date: 10.09.2024
Presiding Officer.
CGIT-cum-Labour Court-II