Allahabad High Court

CRLP/8589/2024 of ROHAN TRIPATHI @ SHUBHAM TIWARI AND 8 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT.OF HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS on 21 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8589 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Heard Shri Anoop Kumar Upadhyay, learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This petition seeks issuance of direction

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8589 of 2024

Court No. - 10

HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.

HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Shri Anoop Kumar Upadhyay, learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. bearing FIR No.0836 of 2024, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 333, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 109 and 61 (2) of B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Gonda.

3. Learned A.G.A., on the basis of instruction dated 21.11.2025 received from Sub-Inspector Amarnath, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, district Gonda, submits that charge-sheet No. 01 of 2025 dated 25.03.2025 has been filed in the Court of A.D.J.-III/N.I.A., Lucknow, therefore, this petition has lost its efficacy. The said instruction dated 21.11.2025 is taken on record.

5. At this stage, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press this petition furthermore and the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to avail appropriate remedy under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. To which there is no objection by learned AGA.

6. In view of above, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. November 21, 2025 Ajit Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anoop Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Abhishek, Utkarsh Misra (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Rohan Tripathi @ Shubham Tiwari And 8 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt.Of Home Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead