Allahabad High Court
WRIA/13495/2025 of DR. BRIJENDRA PAL SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. MEDICAL HEALTH FAMILY WELFARE AND ANOTHER on 21 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13495 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 13495 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to consider case of petitioner for promotion to the post of Joint Director (Level-4) with effect from the date from which first person junior to petitioner has been granted such promotion. Sanctioning of all consequential benefits arising out of such promotion has also been sought.
3. It has been submitted that petitioner is fully eligible and qualified for promotion which has been denied to him while the same benefit has been granted to persons junior to him.
4. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.1 i.e. Additional Chief Secretary/Principal Secretary, Department of Medical Health and Family Welfare, U.P., Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of six weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Kumar Pandey, Vinod Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Dr. Brijendra Pal Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Deptt. Medical Health Family Welfare And Another .....Respondent(s)
5. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. November 21, 2025 kvg/- WRIA No. 13495 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench