Allahabad High Court
WRIA/12960/2025 of ANIL KUMAR TRIPATHI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 4 OTHERS on 21 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12960 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. In pursuance of direction issued earlier by this Court on 11.11.2025, Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Assistant Consolidation Officer, Balrampur is present. 2. As directed, the original appointment letter
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 12960 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. In pursuance of direction issued earlier by this Court on 11.11.2025, Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Assistant Consolidation Officer, Balrampur is present.
2. As directed, the original appointment letter of petitioner dated 05.12.1991 along with certified copy of Writ Petition No.7585 (S/S) of 1991 along with copy of interim order dated 23.11.1991 has been provided to the said officer.
3. Since all the relevant documents have been provided to the person concerned, without interfering with the impugned order, opposite party no.4 i.e. Settlement Officer of Consolidation, District, Balrampur is directed to process claims of petitioner with regard to grant of service benefits including selection grade, promotional pay-scale and benefits of assured career progression scheme as admissible to petitioner in view of audit report dated 06.09.2024 as also keeping in view the omission sheet submitted by the Settlement Officer, Consolidation, Bahraich vide letter dated 25.04.2025. For the said purposes, service-book of petitioner shall be verified for the service period of 01.12.1991 till December 1996.
4. Consequential orders shall be passed by the authority concerned expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is submitted before the said authority. In case the petitioner is found entitled to the aforesaid benefits, actual payment Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Mishra, Rajneesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Anil Kumar Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
thereof shall be ensured within a period of six weeks thereafter.
5. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.
November 21, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 12960 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench