Allahabad High Court
/4450/2019 of MOHAMMAD AMEEN Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LUCKNOW and ANR. on 21 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4450 of 2019 . Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard Sri Praveen Kumar Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Sri Anil Kumar Awasthi, learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State. 2. By means of this
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4450 of 2019
.
Court No. - 33
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Praveen Kumar Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Sri Anil Kumar Awasthi, learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.
2. By means of this application, the applicant has raised a challenge to the summoning order dated 16.01.2019 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow as well as charge sheet No.1/2018 dated 06.09.2018 in Case No.2118/2019 Crime No. 150/2018 under Sections 498-A, 323,, 504 & 506 IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Banthana, District Lucknow.
3. This Court vide order dated 13.06.2019, after hearing learned counsel for the contesting parties had referred the matter to the mediation and conciliation centre of this Court and directed the applicant to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- in favour of opposite party No.2.
4. In compliance of order dated 13.06.2019, cash office of this Court has submitted its report dated 28.07.2025 by submitting that no amount has been deposited in favour of opposite party No.2, in compliance of the said order, as on date. Therefore, it is apparently clear that the applicant has not complied with the order passed by this Court dated 13.06.2019 despite availing several opportunities. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Awasthi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohammad Ameen .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lucknow And Anr. .....Opposite Party(s)
5. Considering the aforesaid, particularly the fact that the applicant has not complied with the order of this Court dated 13.06.2019 and cognizable offence is made out against the applicant, therefore, this Court is not inclined to keep this application pending any longer and further to eclipse the proceedings of learned trial court. Accordingly, the application filed U/S 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed.
6. Interim order stands vacated. . (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) November 21, 2025 Reena/- A482 No. 4450 of 2019 2
Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench