Allahabad High Court
CRLP/333/2024 of CHETNA MISHRA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME, GOVT. OF U.P. LUCKNOW AND OTHERS on 21 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 333 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. for the State has pointed out that in the instant case, the investigation has already been concluded, and
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 333 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. for the State has pointed out that in the instant case, the investigation has already been concluded, and the charge sheet has been filed against the petitioner on 01.03.2024. As such the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid fact. In view of the statement made, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum at appropriate stage. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. November 21, 2025 Arvind Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : A.Z. Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Chetna Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home, Govt. Of U.P. Lucknow And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench