Allahabad High Court
A227/6540/2025 of PRAMOD SHAHI Vs BOARD OF REVENUE, STATE OF U.P. THRU. CHAIRMAN, LKO. AND OTHERS on 21 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6540 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Saddam Ahamad Khan, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. 2. In light of the proposed order, notices to private respondents are dispensed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6540 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Saddam Ahamad Khan, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel.
2. In light of the proposed order, notices to private respondents are dispensed with.
3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner has moved an application for correction of the map U/S 30(2) of U.P. Revenue Code before the District Magistrate / Collector, Maharajganj pertaining to correction of map of Gata No. 1557 and 1563 situated at Mauja - Chiuraha Maupakad, Tatpa - Katahara, Paragana - Haweli and Tahsil - Sadar, Maharajganj, District Maharajganj.
4. The said application was allowed on 28.06.2024 and subsequently , he has filed a revision before the Board of Revenue whereupon the said revision has been admitted and notices have been issued to the petitioner and the parties have been directed to maintain status quo with respect to the disputed land.
5. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that till date he has not received the notice but on obtaining information about interim order passed in favour of the revisionist has approached this Court.
6. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand has submitted that petitioner has efficacious and alternate remedy by putting his appearance Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saddam Ahamad Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ajay Kumar Pandey Pramod Shahi .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue, State Of U.P. Thru. Chairman, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
and filing his objections before the revisional court and revisional court on hearing the petitioner has full authority and power to vacate / modify the ex-parte interim order passed in favour of private respondents.
7. Learned counsel for petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid facts and submits that proceedings for vacation of the interim order may be expedited.
8. In light of the above, petitioner is granted liberty to appear before Board of Revenue in the said revision and file his objections within next two weeks and in case the objections are filed, the Board of Revenue is directed to consider and decide the application for interim relief preferred by the private respondents (revisionist) within three weeks thereafter in accordance with law after giving adequate opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned.
9. The petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the proceedings before Board of Revenue.
10. In light of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 21, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 6540 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench