Allahabad High Court

CRLP/10962/2025 of SULEMAN Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 21 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10962 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State- respondents. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to issue a

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10962 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State- respondents. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties not to harass the petitioner and make attempt to arrest him. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that even though no case has been lodged against the petitioner, the respondent authorities are still harassing the petitioner. On the other hand, learned AGA, on the basis of instructions sent by Sri Ram Harish Yadav, Sub Inspector-Police Station Sushant Golf City, Commissionerate Lucknow dated 18.11.2025, states that a missing complaint No. 87 of 2025 had been lodged on 7.11.2025 at the said police station mentioning that one Ms. Lovely Sharma appears to have gone away with the petitioner's son and that the mobile phone of the petitioner's son is switched off. In this regard, the concerned police officer had called on the petitioner's mobile phone in order to gather certain information but he has only expressed his anger upon the said call. Learned AGA further states that the petitioner shall not be harassed in any manner. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dharmendra Pratap Singh, Anuj Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Suleman .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

The aforesaid statement of the learned AGA has been recorded. Accordingly, writ petition stands disposed of. November 21, 2025 AKK CRLP No. 10962 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead