Allahabad High Court
WRIA/13497/2025 of RINKU KUMAR PANDEY Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. COOPERATIVE GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 21 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13497 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 13497 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties for payment of 42 months' salary due to petitioner from May, 2022 till date. A further prayer for payment of regular monthly salary to petitioner has also been sought.
3. Learned State Counsel has not been provided any instructions in the matter.
4. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Commissioner-cum-Registrar, Cooperative U.P., Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of six weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order.
5. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. November 21, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Daya Shankar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Rinku Kumar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Cooperative Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench