Allahabad High Court
WRIA/8005/2024 of SMT. FIROZ BANO Vs ARMED FORCED TRIBUNAL REGIONAL BRANCH LKO. AND 5 OTHERS on 21 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 8005 of 2024 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and Mr. S.B. Pandey leasrned Deputy Solicitor General of India. 2. Petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:- " (i) issue a writ, order or
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 8005 of 2024
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and Mr. S.B. Pandey leasrned Deputy Solicitor General of India.
2. Petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:- " (i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opp. parties i.e. opp.party no.1 to take the necessary and positive action in respect of grievances i.e. compliance of order dated 10.04.2023, of the petitioner, raised in Execution Application No. 225 of 2023, inre O.A.No. 667 of 202, Smt. Firoz Bano Wife of Mohd Yunus Khan (Deceased) v. UOI &ors, under Section 29 R/W S.19 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 R/W S.12 of Contempt of Courts Act and R/W Order 21 (XXI) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as contained in annexure no. 1 to this writ petition, expeditiously within the stipulated time as provided by this Hon'ble court, and protect the livelihood of the widow petitioner from the opp.party no. 02 to 06 and their associates in the interest of justice and kindness from the Hon'ble court, in the interest of justice. "
3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that inadvertently incorrect pleadings have been made in the petition due to which he requires to file afresh.
4. In view of such submission, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to petitioner to file afresh. November 21, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Kumar Pandey, Dheerendra Kr. Agnihotri, Manoj Kumar Awasthi, Vishnu Kant Awasthi Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I. (Manish Mathur,J.) Smt. Firoz Bano .....Petitioner(s) Armed Forced Tribunal Regional Branch Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench