Allahabad High Court
A227/6807/2025 of SANTOSH SHUKLA AND ANOTHER Vs TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL MUSAFIRKHANA, AMETHI AND OTHERS on 21 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6807 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kr. Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6807 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kr. Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the State respondent to decide Mutation Case No. 1775/2024 (Computerized Case No. T202404710201775(Santosh Shukla Vs. Dinesh Kumar) U/S 34/35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
4. It is urged that though the matter is being listed but for one reason or the other, the aforesaid case is not being decided.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case State-respondent considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
6. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil Musafirkhana, District Amethi is directed to decide Mutation Case No. 1775/2024 (Computerized Case No. T202404710201775(Santosh Shukla Vs. Dinesh Kumar) U/S 34/35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Girija Shankar Tripathi, Jai Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Santosh Shukla And Another .....Petitioner(s) Tehsildar, Tehsil Musafirkhana, Amethi And Others .....Respondent(s)
a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
8. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
9. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 21, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 6807 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench