Allahabad High Court
WRIA/6026/2022 of HARBIR SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT., CIVIL SECRETARIAT, LKO. AND 4 OTHERS on 21 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 6026 of 2022 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Mr. Anwar Ashfaq learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority to permit petitioner
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 6026 of 2022
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. Anwar Ashfaq learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority to permit petitioner to join training on the post of Sub-Inspector (Civil Police) in the Police Training Centre, Unnao.
3. It has been submitted that petitioner was selected on the aforesaid post but has not been permitted to join the training only on account of the fact that he was late in joining the training period. It is submitted that that since the aforesaid aspect occurred during the COVID pandemic, some leverage was required to petitioner. He has placed his reliance on two judgments rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Tarunesh versus State of Rajasthan, 2015 SCC OnLine Raj 4567 and Babu Lal Meena & others versus State of Rajasthan & others, 2015 SCC OnLine Raj 11250. It is submitted that petitioner was earlier engaged in the Central Reserve Police Force and provided his joining on the very next date his resignation was accepted.
4. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before concerned authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided in light of the judgments indicated herein above in case the same are applicable, within a period of six weeks from the date a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anwar Ashfaq, Rina Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Harbir Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Civil Secretariat, Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
5. The petition stands disposed of. November 21, 2025 prabhat WRIA No. 6026 of 2022 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench