Allahabad High Court

CRLP/11016/2025 of MOHD. MUSHTAFA @ BABU AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND OTHERS on 21 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11016 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA appearing on behalf of the respondents no. 1 to 3. 2. No notice need be issued to the

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11016 of 2025

Court No. - 11

HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.

HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA appearing on behalf of the respondents no. 1 to 3.

2. No notice need be issued to the respondent no. 4 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed.

3. Instant writ petition has been filed praying for quashing of the First Information Report dated 13.11.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 0863 of 2025 under Sections 191 (2), 193 (3), 190, 109, 352, 351 (3) of B.N.S, 2023 and Section 7 of the C.L.A Act at Police Station- Kotwali Nagar District- Sultanpur, a copy of which is annexure 1 to the writ petition.

4. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that a perusal of the allegations levelled in the impugned First Information Report would indicate that the petitioners have attacked the complainant and others and have also taken away the tractor. It is contended that no such incident ever occurred and the impugned First Information Report has been lodged in a malicious manner.

5. On the other hand, learned AGA states on the basis of instructions sent by Sri Shanker Baksh Singh, Police Station- Kotwali Nagar District- Sultanpur dated 18.11.2025 that no injury has been sustained to the complaint.

6. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents-authorities not to take any coercive action Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satyendra Nath Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Mohd. Mushtafa @ Babu And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)

against the petitioners till any cogent/credible evidence is found against them.

7. Needless to mention that the petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation. In case of non cooperation, the petitioners will not be entitled to the benefit of this order. November 21, 2025 Pachhere/- CRLP No. 11016 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead