Allahabad High Court
WRIA/13521/2025 of RAM MANORATH AND 4 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. AYUSH ANUBHAG-1 LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 21 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13521 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking following reliefs:- "(i) Issue a
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 13521 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking following reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to regularize the services of the Petitioners w.e.f 20.12.2001 and grant them all service benefit along with arrear and interest within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.
(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to treat the Petitioners to be regularize w.e.f 20.12.2001 and make the payment of post retiral dues and pension after attaining the age of superannuation within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.
(iii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite parties to extend the benefit of the order dated 06.05.2025 passed in Special Appeal No. 607 of 2024 (State of U.P. and 2 Others vs. Chandra Mohan Yadav) and other similar matter which are affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Tauseef Siddiqui, Shareef Ahmad, Shiv Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Manorath And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Ayush Anubhag-1 Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
3. Since considering petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Director, Ayurved Services, Government of U.P., Lucknow who shall consider and decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order in light of judgment of Chandra Mohan Yadav (supra) in case it is applicable.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. November 21, 2025 lakshman WRIA No. 13521 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench