Allahabad High Court
CRLP/3431/2024 of SMT. NEHA AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND OTHERS on 21 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3431 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Case called out. None is present on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. There is no request for pass over or adjournment of the case.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3431 of 2024
Court No. - 10
HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Case called out. None is present on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. There is no request for pass over or adjournment of the case.
2. This Court had passed the following order on 14.05.2024:- "By means of this writ petition, the petitioners prayed for issuance of mandamus commanding the opposite parties not to harass the petitioners and interfere in the peaceful married life. Petitioners claim to have married each other of their own volition and also claim that on the date of their marriage i.e. 07.05.2024, they were of marriageable age. Petitioners have annexed their Aadhar Cards in this regard as proof of age. He further says that there is no F.I.R. against the petitioners and they are not wanted in any criminal case yet the police is harassing them at the behest of family members who are not agreeable to the marriage. Therefore, this petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the opposite parties not to interfere in peaceful married life of the petitioners. Learned counsel for petitioners states that petitioners have applied to get their marriage registered and he will produce the marriage registration certificate within a period of two weeks from today. List after two weeks. Meanwhile, service shall be effected upon respondent no.3 through the respondent no.2 within a period of two weeks from today. List after two weeks. In view of above, it is provided that if the petitioners have married each other and are living together, were of marriageable age on the date of their marriage and they are not wanted in any criminal case then the Police shall not unnecessarily interfere in their peaceful married life. It is, however, made clear that this Court has not entered into nor adjudicated the age of the petitioners nor veracity/validity of the alleged marriage." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yogeshwar Sharan Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Smt. Neha And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And Others .....Respondent(s)
3. Learned AGA, on the basis of instructions, submits that no F.I.R. has been lodged against the petitioners, therefore, the question of the petitioners being harassed does not arise.
4. In view of above, this petition has been filed with misconceived grounds and liable to be dismissed. However, none is present to controvert the same.
5. Dismissed accordingly.
November 21, 2025 Akanksha Sri/- CRLP No. 3431 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench