Allahabad High Court
/10836/2025 of DHEERAJ YADAV Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND OTHERS on 19 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10836 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard. 2. Instant petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondents more particularly respondents no.2 and 3 not to
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10836 of 2025
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard.
2. Instant petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondents more particularly respondents no.2 and 3 not to harass and interfere in the peaceful living of the petitioner.
3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite there being no FIR against the petitioner and the petitioner working on the post of Executive Engineer in Urban Electricity Distribution Division, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow, he is being harassed by respondents no.2 and 3.
4. On the other hand, learned AGA on the basis of instructions sent by Sri Ashish Kumar Pandey, Sub-Inspector, Police Station Indira Nagar, states that the petitioner is not being harassed in any manner and no FIR has been lodged against him. He further states on the basis of instructions dated 19.11.2025 sent by SHO Gomti Nagar and by Sri Gyan Prakash, Sub- Inspector, Police Station Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow, that the petitioner is not being harassed in any manner and nothing is found against him.
5. The aforesaid statement of learned AGA is recorded and the writ petition is disposed of. November 19, 2025 A. Katiyar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravi Shanker Singh, Ajay Pratap Singh, Pragati Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Dheeraj Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench