Allahabad High Court
/6756/2025 of MAHENDRA NATH AND 2 OTHERS Vs BOARD OF REVENUE, U.P. LKO. THRU. MEMBER (JUDICIAL) AND ANOTHER on 19 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6756 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent and perused the records. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6756 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent and perused the records.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 -Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow to decide revision No.1304/2005-06, computerized case No.R200605210026139 "Kaushal Kishor Vs. Mahendra Nath", expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow is directed to decide revision No.1304/2005-06, computerized case No.R200605210026139 "Kaushal Kishor Vs. Mahendra Nath" expeditiously, say within a period of six months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment.
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 19, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hari Om Pandey, Arun Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Mahendra Nath And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue, U.P. Lko. Thru. Member (Judicial) And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench