Allahabad High Court
/9122/2024 of DIPAK Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. HOME SECY. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS on 19 November 2025
OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9122 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This Court had passed the following order on 02.12.2024:-
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9122 of 2024
Court No. - 10
HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. This Court had passed the following order on 02.12.2024:- "1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. Petitioner has approached this Court for the following main relief: "a. a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding to the opposite party no.2 to 3 to take legal action against the opposite party no.4 to 7 in pursuance to the First Information Report lodged by the petitioner at Case Crime No.0129/2019 under section 115(2), 352, 351(2) B.N.S. Police Station Mahigawan, District Lucknow against the opposite party no.4 to 7 on 24.10.2024."
3. The Investigating Officer concerned is directed to file his personal affidavit with regard to active investigation made in the case within four weeks.
4. List this case after four weeks."
3. Learned A.G.A., on the basis of instructions, submits that after investigation charge-sheet dated 28.12.2024 was forwarded to the concerned court, therefore, the petition has lost its efficacy.
4. Dismissed accordingly.
November 19, 2025 Anand/-
Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar, Rakesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Dipak .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Home Secy. Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench