Allahabad High Court
/12977/2025 of BREJESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA AND 6 OTHERS Vs UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS NEW DELHI AND 3 OTHERS on 19 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12977 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 12977 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties to grant benefit of modified assured career progression financial upgradation of Grade Pays Rs.4600/- and 4800/- respectively with all consequential benefits. Further prayer has been made to opposite parties to recompute their last pay drawn on notional basis and refix pension, gratuity and commutation accordingly. Petitioners have also sought interest on the arrears.
3. Since considering petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to file fresh individual representation(s) before opposite party no.4 i.e. the Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, North Eastern Railways, Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such representations are filed, the same are required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from receipt of representation(s) of petitioners along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. November 19, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Kumar Singh, Madhur Kumar, Rajat Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I. (Manish Mathur,J.) Brejesh Kumar Srivastava And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Railways New Delhi And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench