Allahabad High Court

/394/2025 of PHOOL CHANDRA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND ANOTHER on 19 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 394 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard. The present appeal has been filed for the following main relief:- "WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to quash the summoning

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 394 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard. The present appeal has been filed for the following main relief:- "WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to quash the summoning order dated 13.8.2024 passed by the Special Judge SC/ST Act, Ambedkar Nagar in Complaint No. 84 of 2020/Warrant or Summons Criminal Case No. 79 of 2020 Shobhawati Devi Versus Mahendra Kumar" under section 406, 420, 504, 506 IPC & 3(1)(da) & 3(1)(dha) of SC/ST Act whereby the learned Judge has summoned the Appellant directing him to appear before the court to face the trauma of trial and also quash the entire proceeding of Complaint No. 84 of 2020/Warrant or Summons Criminal Case No. 79 of 2020 Shobhawati Devi Versus Mahendra Kumar" under section 406, 420, 504, 506 IPC & 3(1)(da) & 3(1)(dha) of SC/ST Act related to Police Station- Kotwali Akbarpur, District- Ambedkar Nagar, pending before the Special Judge SC/ST Act, Ambedkar Nagar, so far it relates to the appellant." At the very outset, learned Counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press the present appeal and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn. To the aforesaid prayer, learned AGA has no objection. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. November 19, 2025 Jyoti/- Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Ram Singh, Amit Kumar Keshari, Azmi Yousuf, Kahkashan Zaidi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Phool Chandra .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead