Allahabad High Court
/394/2025 of PHOOL CHANDRA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND ANOTHER on 19 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 394 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard. The present appeal has been filed for the following main relief:- "WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to quash the summoning
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 394 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard. The present appeal has been filed for the following main relief:- "WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to quash the summoning order dated 13.8.2024 passed by the Special Judge SC/ST Act, Ambedkar Nagar in Complaint No. 84 of 2020/Warrant or Summons Criminal Case No. 79 of 2020 Shobhawati Devi Versus Mahendra Kumar" under section 406, 420, 504, 506 IPC & 3(1)(da) & 3(1)(dha) of SC/ST Act whereby the learned Judge has summoned the Appellant directing him to appear before the court to face the trauma of trial and also quash the entire proceeding of Complaint No. 84 of 2020/Warrant or Summons Criminal Case No. 79 of 2020 Shobhawati Devi Versus Mahendra Kumar" under section 406, 420, 504, 506 IPC & 3(1)(da) & 3(1)(dha) of SC/ST Act related to Police Station- Kotwali Akbarpur, District- Ambedkar Nagar, pending before the Special Judge SC/ST Act, Ambedkar Nagar, so far it relates to the appellant." At the very outset, learned Counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press the present appeal and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn. To the aforesaid prayer, learned AGA has no objection. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. November 19, 2025 Jyoti/- Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Ram Singh, Amit Kumar Keshari, Azmi Yousuf, Kahkashan Zaidi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Phool Chandra .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench