Allahabad High Court

/1334/2025 of AYODHYA PRASAD Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND ANOTHER on 19 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1334 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard Sri Arun Kumar Tewari, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, learned AGA for the State of U.P. as well as perused the record. 2. By means of the

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1334 of 2025

Court No. - 13

HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Sri Arun Kumar Tewari, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, learned AGA for the State of U.P. as well as perused the record.

2. By means of the instant revision, the revisionist has challenged/impeached the order dated 28.10.2025 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Gonda (in short "Family Court") in Criminal Misc. Case No. 242 of 2019 (Smt. Raj Kumari vs. Ayodhya Prasad), whereby an application preferred by the side opposite in terms of Section 125(3) Cr.P.C. has been rejected.

3. Vide order under challenge dated 28.10.2025, the Family Court issued recovery warrants for recovery of amount indicated in the order dated 10.05.2019 passed in Maintenance Case No. 689 of 2017 (Smt. Raj Kumari vs. Ayodhya Prasad @ Raju) preferred by side opposite in terms of Section 125 Cr.P.C. The operative portion of the order dated 10.05.2019 reads as under:- "आदेश प्राार्थिनी द्वाारा प्रस्तुतुत भरण पोषण प्राार्थना पत्र तदनुसार निस्तातारित करते हुए विपक्षीी अयोध्याया प्रसाद उर्फ राजू को आदेशित किया जाता है कि वह प्राार्थना पत्र प्रस्तुतुत करने की तिथि 04.11.2017 से प्राार्थिनी श्रीीमती राज कुमारी को मु० 3000 (तीन हजार रूपये) प्रतिमाह अदा करना सुनिश्चित करें। भरण पोषण राशि प्रत्येयेक कैलेण्डडर माह की सांतवी तारीख को अदा किया जाना सुनिश्चित करें। निर्णय व आदेश की प्रति निशुल्कक नियमानुसार प्राार्थिनी को प्रााप्तत Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Arun Kumar Tewari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ayodhya Prasad .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s)

करायी जाये। पत्राावली नियमानुसार दाखिल दफ्ततर हो।"

4. From the aforesaid, it is apparent that the consequential order i.e. the order dated 28.10.2025 has been challenged in this revision and main order i.e. the order dated 10.05.2019 passed by the Family Court has not been challenged.

5. Accordingly, this Court finds no force in the instant revision. It is accordingly dismissed. November 19, 2025 Arun/- CRLR No. 1334 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead