Allahabad High Court
/13337/2025 of YOGESH SRIVASTAVA AND 7 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER on 19 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13337 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly following prayer:- (i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 13337 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly following prayer:-
(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to allow to the petitioners the sum of due leave encashment for 300 days by including the period of service rendered by them under D.R.D.A. prior to its merger on 18.07.2016 after adjusting the sum of already paid to them towards the account of leave encashment, with admissible rate of interest from due date till the date of actual payment of the same."
3. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that aforesaid dispute pertaining to grant of leave encashment for a period of 300 days has already been adjudicated upon in the case of Ganesh Prasad Tiwari v. State of U.P. and others, Writ-A No. 12721 of 2024 which was upheld in Special Appeal Defective No. 210 of 2025 and Special Leave Petition (Civil) filed against bearing Diary No.48921 of 2025 has also been dismissed on 17.10.2025.
4. Considering the aforesaid said, liberty is granted to petitioners to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. The Commissioner, Rural Development, Govt. of U.P., Lucknow who shall consider and decide the same, in light of judgment rendered in the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ninnie Shrivastava, Mukul Misra, Sushma Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Yogesh Srivastava And 7 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Rural Development Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s)
case of Ganesh Prasad Tiwari (supra) in case the same is applicable, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
5. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. November 19, 2025 lakshman WRIA No. 13337 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench