Allahabad High Court
/13214/2025 of SUDHAKAR KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT., LUCKNOW AND 3 OTHERS on 19 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13214 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 13214 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to provide one more opportunity to petitioner to appear in the physical efficiency test (running test) for the post of Sub-Inspector in pursuance of advertisement issued in year 2022.
3. It has been submitted that petitioner was unable to qualify the said test by only eight seconds due to fact that he was suffering from dengue fever and therefore in terms of the prescribed conditions, one more opportunity was required to be given to petitioner.
4. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.4 i.e. Inspector General of Police/Additional Director General of Police (Recruitment), U.P., Police Recruitment and Promotion Board, Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order expeditiously.
4. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. November 19, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravi Shankar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Sudhakar Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Lucknow And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench