Allahabad High Court
/9049/2024 of DIKSHA DIXIT AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 19 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9049 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This Court had passed the following order on 28.11.2024 :- "1.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9049 of 2024
Court No. - 10
HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. This Court had passed the following order on 28.11.2024 :- "1. Heard.
2. By means of this petition, the petitioners, Diksha Dixit and Ramji Tiwari, have sought quashing of First Information Report dated 05.11.2024 bearing F.I.R./Case Crime No.724 of 2024, under Section 87 of B.N.S., 2023 registered at Police Station Kotwali City, District Hardoi.
3. The contention of the learned Counsel for the petitioners is that petitioners are major and have married with each other out of their own free will on 05.11.2024 as per Hindu rites and rituals at Shiv Hanuman Mandir, Railway Station Road, Sriganganagar. They also got registered their marriage on 07.11.2024, a copy of which has been annexed as Annexure No. 2 to the writ petition. The High School Certificate of petitioner no.1 and Aadhar Card of petitioner no.2 have annexed as Annexure No.3 and 4, respectively, to the writ petition as proof of age. They are enjoying and living peaceful matrimonial life.
4. Prima facie, a case for consideration is made out.
5. Issue notice to opposite party no.4. Steps be taken within a week.
6. Office shall submit service report by affixing computer generated tracking report.
7. Let counter affidavit be filed within four weeks.
8. List after four weeks.
9. Considering the submissions made, it is provided that till the next date of listing, the petitioner no.2-Ramji Tiwari shall Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajeet Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Diksha Dixit And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
not be arrested on the basis of the impugned First Information Report, unless sufficient and credible evidence is available against him. The petitioners shall, however, cooperate in the investigation and get their statement recorded before the Investigating Officer as and when they are called. If they do not do so then it can be made a ground for seeking vacation of this interim order."
3. There is consensus among learned counsel for the parties that final report in the matter has been forwarded, therefore, this petition has been rendered infructuous.
4. Dismissed accordingly. November 19, 2025 Anand/- CRLP No. 9049 of 2024 2 (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench