Allahabad High Court
/6771/2025 of MEENA SINGH @ MEENU SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS on 19 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6771 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondent is hereby
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6771 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondent is hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 -Tehsildar, Tehsil Lalganj, District Pratapgarh to decide case No.4551 of 2022, computerized case No.T 202202570204551 under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, new number RST/2227/2025, computerized case No.T202502570202227 "Meena Singh @ Meenu Singh Vs. Rakesh Kumar Singh", expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 - Tehsildar, Tehsil Lalganj, District Pratapgarh is directed to decide case No.4551 of 2022, computerized case No.T 202202570204551 under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, new number RST/2227/2025, computerized case No.T202502570202227 "Meena Singh @ Meenu Singh Vs. Rakesh Kumar Singh" expeditiously, say within a period of three months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned , if there is no legal impediment.
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 19, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kirti Veer Singh, Ravi Shanker Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Meena Singh @ Meenu Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench