Allahabad High Court
/13253/2025 of PRAVEEN KUMAR SAGAR AND 6 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF LABOUR, LKO. AND ANOTHER on 19 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13253 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:- "(I) A writ, order or direction in the nature
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 13253 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:- "(I) A writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari thereby quashing the order dated 27.11.1992 and 01.08.1997, passed by the opposite party no.1, which is contained in Annexure No.1 & 2 of the writ petition. (II) A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the opposite parties to re-fix the pay scale of the Petitioners by providing the benefit of judgment and order dated 20.4.2017, passed by this Hon'ble Court in the case of Anil Kumar Vs. State of UP, WP No. 8571/1992 (S/S), as well as judgment and order dated 07.08.2024 passed by this Hon'ble Court in Writ-A No.5271 of 2024, Radha & Another Vs. State of U.P. & Another. (III) A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the opposite parties to fix the pay of the petitioners in the pay scale of Rs.330-495 revised to Rs.825-1200 alongwith corresponding revised pay scale for the post of untrained Dressers and Rs.400-615 revised to Rs.1200-2040 alongwith corresponding revised pay scale with arrears thereof for trained Dressers in accordance with Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mayankar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Praveen Kumar Sagar And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Labour, Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s)
Government Order dated 24.05.2024."
3. At the very outset, on the basis of instructions, learned counsel for petitioners does not press prayer - I and submits that representation may be directed to be decided.
4. Considering the innocuous prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioners and without entering into the merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioners to file a fresh representation before opposite party No.2 i.e. Director, Employees State Insurance Scheme, Labour and Health Services, Sarvodaya Nagar, Kanpur who shall consider and decide, in light of judgments referred in prayer - II in case the same are applicable, within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 19, 2025 lakshman WRIA No. 13253 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench