Allahabad High Court
/179/2025 of SHABBAN Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. FOREST, LKO. AND OTHERS on 19 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. - 179 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Shesh Narain Pandey, learned counsel for review applicant. 2. By means of present review application, the applicant has sought a review of the judgment and
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. - 179 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Shesh Narain Pandey, learned counsel for review applicant.
2. By means of present review application, the applicant has sought a review of the judgment and order dated 04.07.2022 where the writ petition preferred by the petitioner was dismissed where the order rejecting his claim for compassionate appointment was assailed before this Court.
3. The writ petition was dismissed considering the fact that the father of the petitioner had died on 13.09.1971 but according to his High School Certificate, his date of birth was shown 15.06.1974. A doubt was created with regard to his parentage and hence the writ petition was dismissed.
4. At the very outset, this Court has inquired as to whether the date of birth in the High School Certificate has been changed in consonance with sufficient material adduced.learned counsel for petitioner has clearly submitted that the date of birth of the petitioner continues to be 15.06.1974 as per High School Certificate. The writ petition was dismissed on 04.07.2022 while present writ review application has been filed more than 2 years and 4 months and delay in paragraph No. 3 only reason stated is that petitioner was having no knowledge regarding legal technicalities. The delay has been sought to be condoned.
5. Apart from the above, this Court does not find any error apparent on Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shesh Narain Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
Shabban .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Forest, Lko. And Others .....Opposite Party(s)
the face of record necessitating review of the previous order. Accordingly, the present review application is bereft of merits and is accordingly dismissed. November 19, 2025 Ravi/ CMRAD No. 179 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench