Allahabad High Court
A227/6726/2025 of SMT. MADHURI Vs THE LEARNED COURT OF ADDL. COMMISSIONER (JUDICIAL), MANDAL AYODHYA, AYODHYA AND OTHERS on 18 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6726 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no. 1 and 4 and Shri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.3. 2.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6726 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no. 1 and 4 and Shri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.3.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondent, is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.1 to take necessary action and decide the Revision No. 949/2023(Computerized Case No. 202304000000949) under Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006; Smt. Madhuri Versus Smt. Gudiya and others, pending before the opposite party no.1 expeditiously within stipulated period of 6 months or as early as possible in the interest of justice.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1 - is directed to make all endeavor to decide the Revision No. 949/2023(Computerized Case No. 202304000000949) under Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006; Smt. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ankit Pandey, Navneet Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Smt. Madhuri .....Petitioner(s) The Learned Court Of Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Mandal Ayodhya, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s)
Madhuri Versus Smt. Gudiya and others, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 18, 2025 Muk A227 No. 6726 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench