Allahabad High Court

CRLP/4566/2025 of UJJWAL SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS on 18 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4566 of 2025 and CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5007 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Case called out. 2. Counter affidavit filed by learned A.G.A. is taken on record. 3. None is

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4566 of 2025

and

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5007 of 2025

Court No. - 11

HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.

HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Case called out.

2. Counter affidavit filed by learned A.G.A. is taken on record.

3. None is present on behalf of the petitioner despite a notice being affixed for taking up the matter at 02:15 P.M.

4. The instant petition has been filed praying for quashing for the F.I.R. dated 15.03.2025 registered as F.I.R. No.73 of 2025, under Sections 3(5), 109, 351(2), 351(3) of B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Kudwar, District Sultanpur.

5. Learned A.G.A., on the basis of averments contained in para 11 and 12 of the counter affidavit, states, that charge sheet dated 01.06.2025 has been submitted against the petitioner-Ujjwal Singh and charge sheet dated Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravi Yadav, Paritosh Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Versus Ujjwal Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Shyam Sundar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

12.06.2025 has been submitted against the petitioner Shyam Sundar Mishra in connected Criminal Misc Writ Petition No.5007 of 2025.

6. Considering the aforesaid, it is apparent that both writ petitions have been rendered infructuous.

7. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous.

8. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. November 18, 2025 Renu/- CRLP No. 4566 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead