Allahabad High Court
CRLP/10797/2025 of TAUSEEB AHMAD Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT., PRATAPGARH AND OTHERS on 18 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10797 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned AGA appearing for respondents No. 1 to 3. 2. No notice is being issued to the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10797 of 2025
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned AGA appearing for respondents No. 1 to 3.
2. No notice is being issued to the respondent No.4 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed.
3. By means of this petition, the petitioner has raised a challenge to the FIR dated 17.03.2025 vide Case Crime No.0067 of 2025 under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 109(1) & 324(4) B.N.S. (old Sections 323, 504, 506, 307, 427 IPC) registered at Police Station Raniganj, District Pratapgarh.
4. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that bare perusal of the impugned FIR would indicate that the main allegations have been levelled against one Sri Mohammad Raees and no role has been assigned to the petitioner.
5. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that on the basis of the aforesaid FIR, the respondent authorities are trying to arrest the petitioner.
6. On the other hand, learned AGA on the basis of instructions states that the investigation is still going on and the petitioner has been named on the basis of confessional statement of the main accused Mohammad Raees. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jay Prakash Singh Vats, Ajay Kumar Soni Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Tauseeb Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Pratapgarh And Others .....Respondent(s)
7. Considering the aforesaid i.e. investigation is going on and the petitioner has been named only on the basis of the confessional statement of the main accused, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent authorities not to take any coercive action against the petitioner in pursuance to the impugned FIR till filing of the police report.
8. Needless to mention that the petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation. November 18, 2025 Reena/- CRLP No. 10797 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench