Allahabad High Court
A227/6734/2025 of YOGENDRA @ JOGINDER PERSHAD PANDEY Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF / PRIN. SECY., REVENUE AND 2 OTHERS on 18 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6734 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Aviral Srivastava, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents. 2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner seeks
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6734 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Aviral Srivastava, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents.
2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to Tehsildar (Nyayik), Tehsil Tarabganj, District - Gonda to decide the recall application dated 27.12.2006 expeditiously.
3. It is noticed that for the same prayer the petitioner has approached previously by filing a writ petition being Matter Under Article 227 No. 4560 of 2023 which was disposed of directing respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the application for recall within a period of four months from the next date fixed.
4. It is noticed that it is for the same prayer which was subject matter of previous writ petition, present writ petition has been filed. It is also noticed that second writ petition for the same cause of action is not maintainable and the directions as prayed by the petitioner in the present writ petition has already been granted previously by order dated 14.09.2023. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aviral Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Yogendra @ Joginder Pershad Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief / Prin. Secy., Revenue And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. In light of the above, the writ petitions is not maintainable, accordingly, the same is dismissed. However, the petitioner can move an appropriate application for expeditious disposal before the authority concerned. November 18, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 6734 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench