CRLP/10677/2025 of VISHAL YADAV @ DHARM SINGH YADAV Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 18 November 2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the respondents-State.

2. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner states that as the order under challenge has been passed under Section 14(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act, 1986') against which the petitioner has remedy of filing a representation before the competent authority under Section 15 of the Act, 1986 as such he intends to avail the said remedy and prays that the competent authority be directed to decide the representation in accordance with law under relevant rules expeditiously. To the aforesaid prayer, learned A.G.A. has no objection.

4. Considering the aforesaid, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to file a representation under the provisions of the Act, 1986 in accordance with law under relevant rules, which representation should be decided within a period of four weeks from the date of filing of the representation along with a receipt of a certified copy of this order. November 18, 2025 prateek Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prem Chandra Chauhan Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Vishal Yadav @ Dharm Singh Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench