Allahabad High Court

CRLP/10762/2025 of PREETI Vs JOINT DIRECTOR OF DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ZONAL OFFICE-16, LKO. AND ANOTHER on 18 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10762 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Nidhi Navi, Advocate holding brief of Sri Rohit Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent no.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10762 of 2025

Court No. - 11

HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.

HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Nidhi Navi, Advocate holding brief of Sri Rohit Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent no.

1.

2. No notice need be issued to the respondent no. 2 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed.

3. Instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the learned Court having jurisdiction/authority concerned to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of direction issued by this Court in Crl. Misc. Writ Petition No. 20172 of 2023 Inre; Prakash Chandra Tiwari Vs. Union of India and Ors.

4. There is consensus at bar that the matter in issue is squarely covered by an order of this Court dated 20.03.2025 passed in Crl. Misc. Writ Petition No. 1734 of 2025 Inre; Jhakdi Sahu Vs. Joint Director of Enforcement and Ors, a copy of which is annexure 1A to the writ petition whereby the similar writ petition filed before this Court praying for similar reliefs had been disposed of permitting the petitioner to raise his claim before the Special Court of Anti Corruption C.B.I (West), Lucknow in accordance with law and the learned Court has been directed to consider the same after hearing all the parties concerned in accordance with law.

5. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jai Singh Chauhan Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rohit Tripathi Preeti .....Petitioner(s) Joint Director Of Directorate Of Enforcement Zonal Office-16, Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s)

open to the petitioner to raise his claim before the Special Court of Anti Corruption C.B.I (West), Lucknow in accordance with law which Court shall proceed to consider the same after hearing all the parties concerned in accordance with law. November 18, 2025 Pachhere/- CRLP No. 10762 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead