Allahabad High Court
CRLA/3721/2025 of MAHESH SINGH AND 4 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO AND ANOTHER on 17 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3721 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard Ms. Priya Mishra, learned counsel for the appellant(s) and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant(s) for
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3721 of 2025
Court No. - 13
HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
3
Decisions referred to
In this index
2
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Ms. Priya Mishra, learned counsel for the appellant(s) and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record.
2. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant(s) for the following main relief(s):- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to set aside the impugned summoning order dated 4.9.2025 in Case Crime No-15/2024, issued by the learned court below, and allow the criminal appeal after summoning the records from the court below by quashing/setting the entire criminal proceedings of the aforesaid complaint case also in the interest of justice, which is pending before the learned court below."
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant(s) submitted that at this stage, he is confining his prayer to seek the benefit of the judgment(s) passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116 for which liberty may be given to the applicant(s) and liberty may also be given to the appellant(s) to approach this Court again at appropriate stage for seeking appropriate relief.
4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the appellant(s).
5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present appeal is disposed of with Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Santosh Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Mahesh Singh And 4 Others .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko And Another .....Respondent(s)
liberty as prayed for.
6. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today, they would not take any coercive action against the appellant(s) in the aforesaid case. It is made clear that in this regard, no application shall be entertained.
November 17, 2025 Jyoti/- CRLA No. 3721 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench