CRLP/10857/2025 of SHYAMU Vs STATE OF U.P. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND OTHERS on 17 November 2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has approached opposite party no.3/ Commissioner of Police, District- Lucknow for lodging the F.I.R., however no heed has been paid in the matter in question. So, the petitioner has approached this Court with the following main relief:- "issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding the opposite party no. 1 & 2 to take appropriate action against opposite party no. 3 & 4 in the light of judgment Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in case of Lalita Kumari Versus Govt. of U.P. & others well as as issue the circular no. 15011/91/2013-SC/ST-W on dated 06.02.2014 Government of India Ministry of Home Affairs Center state division as annexure no 1 to this writ petition."

3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record as well as taking into consideration the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1, we hereby direct the petitioner to approach opposite party no.3/ Commissioner of Police, District- Lucknow in respect to the grievances which he has raised in the present writ petition and thereafter opposite party no.2 shall take appropriate steps in the matter in question as per law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lalita Kumari (supra).

4. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. November 17, 2025 Haseen U. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Irfan Siddiqui, Kavish Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Shyamu .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench