Allahabad High Court
CRLP/10852/2025 of BIPIN SHAH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO AND OTHERS on 17 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10852 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the record. 2. The petitioner
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10852 of 2025
Court No. - 30
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the record.
2. The petitioner has approached this Court with the following main reliefs :- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding thereby opposite party nos. 1, 2 & 3 to register the First Information Report against opposite party no. 4 to 9 in the light of judgement and order passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of U.P. & others reported in AIR (2014) 2 SCC 1 and the investigation may be conducted by Special Investigating Team constituted, in the interest of justice.
(ii) Issue writ, order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.
(iii) Allow the writ petition of the petitioner with costs."
3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record as well as taking into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Kumar Gupta, Ashish Kumar Singh, Shivani Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Bipin Shah .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko And Others .....Respondent(s)
Uttar Pradesh and others reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1, we leave it open to the petitioner to approach opposite party No. 2 in respect to the grievances, which he has raised in the present writ petition and thereafter, opposite party no. 2 shall take appropriate steps in the matter in question as per law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lalita Kumari (supra).
4. With the above observations, the instant writ petition is finally disposed of. November 17,
Nadim CRLP No. 10852 of 2025
(Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench