CRLP/10864/2025 of ARTI MISHRA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME, LKO. AND OTHERS on 17 November 2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has approached opposite party no.2/ Superintendent of Police, District-Raebareli for lodging the F.I.R., however no heed has been paid in the matter in question. So, the petitioner has approached this Court with the following main relief:- "Issue writ order in nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party No.2&3 that they consider the application of petitioner dated 03.11.2025 and do needful in the matter i.e. for registration of first information report against opposite party No.4 to 7 and to also ensure the peaceful living of petitioner at her matrimonial house with children without any threat and harassment from opposite party No.4 to 7, in the interest of justice."

3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record as well as taking into consideration the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1, we hereby direct the petitioner to approach opposite party no.2/ Superintendent of Police, District-Raebareli in respect to the grievances which he has raised in the present writ petition and thereafter opposite party no.2 shall take appropriate steps in the matter in question as per law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lalita Kumari (supra).

4. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. November 17, 2025 Haseen U. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Arti Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench