Allahabad High Court
WRIA/13199/2025 of SURESHO Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HORTICULTURE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 17 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13199 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Present writ petition is filed by the petitioner claiming that he is working as a daily wager on Class-IV post
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 13199 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. Present writ petition is filed by the petitioner claiming that he is working as a daily wager on Class-IV post since the year 2006, but he is not being paid minimum of pay scale as is being paid to similarly situated employees and in view of a judgment of the Supreme Court in Sabha Shankar Dube v. Divisional Forest Officer reported in AIR 2019 SC 220, he is entitled for the said benefit.
3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would be sufficiently met in case representation of petitioner for the said purposes is considered and decided in a time bound manner.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the same.
5. In view thereof, petitioner is permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no.2-Director, Horticulture and Food Processing, U.P., 2, Sapru Marg, Lucknow, raising all his grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexures and all the documents including a copy of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Sabha Shankar Dube(supra) in support of his claim within a period of three weeks from today along with a computer generated/certified copy of this order. In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of three months from the date a computer generated/certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Ateeq Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Suresho .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Horticulture Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law. ' With the aforesaid directions, present writ petition is disposed of. November 17, 2025 Muk WRIA No. 13199 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench