Allahabad High Court
CRLP/10839/2025 of VARUN TALWAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 17 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10839 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 2. The petitioner has approached this
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10839 of 2025
Court No. - 30
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.
2. The petitioner has approached this Court with the following main relief:- "issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding the opposite party no. 1 & 2 to take appropriate action against opposite party no. 3 & 4 in the light of judgment Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Lalita Kumari versus Govt. of U.P. & others and as well as issue the circular no.15011/91/2013-SC/ST-W on dated 06.02.2014 Government of India Ministry of Home Affairs Center state division as annexure no 1 to this writ petition."
3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record as well as taking into consideration the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1, we leave it open to the petitioner to approach opposite party No. 2 in respect to the grievances which he has raised in the present writ petition and thereafter opposite party no. 4 shall take appropriate steps in the matter in question as per law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lalita Kumari (supra).
Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Irfan Siddiqui, Mohit Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Varun Talwar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. November 17, 2025 kkv/ CRLP No. 10839 of 2025 2 (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench