Allahabad High Court

WRIA/13273/2025 of MANNI LAL Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 15 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13273 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. Heard Sri Anupam Rastogi, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing counsel on behalf of the respondents. 1. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - A No. - 13273 of 2025

Court No. - 5

HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.

Heard Sri Anupam Rastogi, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing counsel on behalf of the respondents.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was appointed on the post of Collection Amin in Sitapur and superannuated from the services on 31.1.2011. He submits that during the service he was entitled to increment on successful completion of 16 and 24 years of satisfactory service which was not given to him and after repeated representations his claim was duly allowed by means of the government order dated 24.7.2018 but the said disbursement has not been made to the petitioner for which purpose he has submitted representation to District Magistrate, Sitapur lastly on 29.9.2025 and prayer has been made for a suitable direction to District Magistrate, Sitapur to decide the same expeditiously.

2. Learned Standing counsel does not object to the innocuous prayer made by the petitioner.

3. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to opposite party No.2 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 29.9.2025, expeditiously, say within six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before him, in accordance with

4. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anupam Rastogi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Manni Lal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

law.

In case, it is found that the petitioner is entitled to the amount due, the same shall be disbursed to him with expedition, say within a period of two months therefrom.

5. November 15, 2025 RKM. WRIA No. 13273 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead