Allahabad High Court
A227/6684/2025 of RAM SUNDAR PAL Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS on 15 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6684 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent nos.1 and 2 and Shri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for respondent no.7. 2.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6684 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent nos.1 and 2 and Shri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for respondent no.7.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents, is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.2- i.e. Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, District Praapgarh to decide the Case No. 9545 of 2023, Ram Sundar Vs. Rajendra Bahadur and others filed by the petitioner on 29.9.2023, under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, regarding Gata No. 1051 area 0.679 Hect. situated in Bhuwalpur, Domipur, Sadar, Pratapgarh, which is pending before him and next date has fixed for 17.11.2025 as early as possible on the next date fixed regarding which copy of orders sheet has been annexed as Annexure No.1 to this petition.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.2- i.e. Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kirti Veer Singh, Ravi Shanker Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Ram Sundar Pal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
District Praapgarh is directed to make all endeavor to decide the Case No. 9545 of 2023, Ram Sundar Vs. Rajendra Bahadur and others filed by the petitioner on 29.9.2023, under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, regarding Gata No. 1051 area 0.679 Hect. situated in Bbhuwalpur, Domipur, Sadar, Pratapgarh, expeditiously, say within a period of Eight months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 15, 2025 Muk A227 No. 6684 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench