Allahabad High Court

WRIC/11071/2025 of ARPIT SINGH Vs DISTT. MAGISTRATE DISTT. RAEBARELI AND 2 OTHERS on 15 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11071 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel, who appears on behalf of State-respondent No.1 and Shri Umesh Singh, learned counsel,

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - C No. - 11071 of 2025

Court No. - 2

HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.

HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel, who appears on behalf of State-respondent No.1 and Shri Umesh Singh, learned counsel, who appears on behalf of respondent Nos.2 and 3.

2. This petition has been filed with the following prayers :- "a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.3, Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Raebareli, to consider and decide the petitioner's application dated 10.09.2024 contained in annexure no.3 for change of ownership/mutation of House No.337, Ward No.13, Mohalla Ambedkar Nagar, Shakti Nagar, Raebareli, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court, as there is no legal impediment in deciding the same.

b) Pass such other and further orders as may be deemed just and proper in the interest of justice."

3. The petitioner's application for mutation is pending before the respondent No.3.

4. This petition is disposed of without entering into the merits of the case, with the direction to the respondent No.3, Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Raebareli to consider and decide the mutation application of the petitioner in accordance with law, by a reasoned and speaking order, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned within a period of three months from the date of copy of this order is produced before him. November 15, 2025 Shubhankar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bharat Kumar Dixit Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Umesh Singh (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Arpit Singh .....Petitioner(s) Distt. Magistrate Distt. Raebareli And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHANKAR THAKUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead