Allahabad High Court
HABC/420/2025 of VINEETA DEVI THRU. HER NEXT FRIEND AND NATURAL GUARDIAN / FATHER BANVARI LAL Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 5 OTHERS on 15 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 420 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):- "(i). Issue an order, writ or direction to bring
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 420 of 2025
Court No. - 13
HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):- "(i). Issue an order, writ or direction to bring the petitioner/detenue before the Hon'ble Court from the custody of the Opposite Party No. 4, 5 and 6 as they have been detained by them against her wish.
(ii) . Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of Habeas Corpus commanding to the respondents not to interfere in peaceful living of the petitioner and her payrents."
3. Considering the contents of instructions dated 13.11.2025 placed by learned AGA under the signature of Sri Bhupendra Singh, Sub-Inspector, Police Station- Majhgai, District- Lakhimpur Kheri, which is taken on record, the victim before the Magistrate concerned while making her statement in terms of Section 183 B.N.S.S. stated that she is aged about 19 years and she has solemnized marriage with Mohan Lal and she wants to live with him and also the fact indicated in the instructions that the final report No. 25/2025 dated 05.09.2025 is pending consideration, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition. It is accordingly dismissed. November 15, 2025 Arun/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramapati Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Vineeta Devi Thru. Her Next Friend And Natural Guardian / Father Banvari Lal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench