Allahabad High Court
A227/6660/2025 of LALTA PRASAD Vs BHAN BAHADUR AND ANOTHER on 14 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6660 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to the private respondent is
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6660 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to the private respondent is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the Court of Tehsildar, Lalganj, District Pratapgarh, to decide Civil Suit No. 252/2015, Bhan Bahadur v. Vinod Kumar, under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006, which is pending since 18.12.2015, expeditiously, within stipulated time period fixed by the Hon'ble Court.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, Court of Tehsildar, Lalganj, District Pratapgarh, is directed to consider and decide the aforesaid Civil Suit No. 252/2015, Bhan Bahadur v. Vinod Kumar, within a period of five months from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before him, in case there is no legal impediment, in accordance with law. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Riya Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Lalta Prasad .....Petitioner(s) Bhan Bahadur And Another .....Respondent(s)
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 14, 2025 A.Nigam A227 No. 6660 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench