Allahabad High Court
NA528/1795/2025 of ANKIT PRAJAPATI @ ANKIT KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SCCY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER on 14 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1795 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed by the applicant for the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1795 of 2025
Court No. - 13
HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
3
Decisions referred to
In this index
2
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record.
2. The present application has been filed by the applicant for the following main relief(s):- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to pass an order allowing the petition quashing the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.455/2024 and impugned Summoning order dated 26.06.2025 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate court no.2, Unnao passed in Complaint Case No.455/2024 by means of which the Petitioners have been summoned Under Section 115,324,352,351(2) 309(1) B.N.S (323,427,504.506,297 I.P.C.) Police Station-Achalganj, District Unnao in "Amit Versus Ankit and others" pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate II, Unnao Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit just and proper may also kindly be passed in favour of the Petitioners."
3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that at this stage, he is confining his prayer to seek the benefit of the judgment(s) passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116 for which liberty may be given to the applicant and liberty may also be given to the applicant to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Chandra Dwivedi, Brij Raj Singh, Mayank Tiwari, Uday Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ankit Prajapati @ Ankit Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Sccy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
approach this Court again at appropriate stage for seeking appropriate relief.
4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant.
5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for.
6. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today, they would not take any coercive action against the applicant in the aforesaid case. It is made clear that in this regard, no application shall be entertained.
November 14, 2025 Jyoti/- NA528 No. 1795 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench