Allahabad High Court
A227/6638/2025 of RISHABH BATRA Vs BOARD OF REVENUE, U.P. LKO THRU. MEMBER JUDICIAL, BOARD OF REVENUE, U.P.,LKO AND OTHERS on 14 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6638 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to the private respondent is
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6638 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to the private respondent is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1- Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow, through its Member (Judicial), Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow, to decide Second Appeal No. 2540/2023, Raj Kumar v. Satpal, (Computerized Case No. R- 20231338002540), expeditiously, within stipulated time period fixed by the Hon'ble Court.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1- Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow, through its Member (Judicial), Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow, is directed to consider and decide the aforesaid Second Appeal No. 2540/2023, Raj Kumar v. Satpal, (Computerized Case No. R-20231338002540), within a period of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mehdi Abbas Rizvi, Prashant Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Rishabh Batra .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue, U.P. Lko Thru. Member Judicial, Board Of Revenue, U.P.,Lko And Others .....Respondent(s)
eight months from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before him, in case there is no legal impediment, in accordance with law.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 14, 2025 A.Nigam A227 No. 6638 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench