Allahabad High Court

A483/962/2025 of HARI PRASAD Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER on 14 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 962 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record. The instant application has been filed for the following main

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 962 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record. The instant application has been filed for the following main relief:- "For the facts reasons and circumstances stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the Learned Civil Judge (S.D.) third Ayodhya to expedite the Complaint Case No. 1936/2024, under section 138 N.I. Act, Hariprasad Vs. Bhulai, Police Station- Kotwali Bikapur, District- Ayodhya, pending since 07.05.2024 with in stipulated period." Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as also that complaint case in issue is pending consideration since May 2024 before the trial court and as per Section 143 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, case under Section 138 of the Act of 1881 shall be concluded expeditiously as possible and an endeavour shall be made to conclude the trial within six months from the date of filing of the complaint, the present application is disposed of with a direction to the Court concerned to decide the case in issue, expeditiously. With the aforesaid, the instant application is disposed of. November 14, 2025 Jyoti/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nishant Kumar Shukla, Awnish Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Hari Prasad .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead