Allahabad High Court
CRLA/2179/2025 of AWADHESH SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER on 14 November 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2179 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant seeking following main
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2179 of 2025
Court No. - 13
HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
3
Decisions referred to
In this index
2
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record.
2. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant seeking following main relief(s):- "Wherefore it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to allow this appeal and set-aside the impugned order dated 27.06.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge SC/ST (P.A.) Act, Hardoi in Anticipatory Bail Application No.1568/2025 after summoning the record from the court below and the appellant may be released on Anticipatory Bail in SC No.496/2024, in Case Crime No.464/2023, U/S-323, 504, 506, 324, 308 IPC and section 3(2)(V)a, 3 (1)(dha) S.C./S.T. Act, relating to Police Station-Beniganj, District-Hardoi, in the interest of justice."
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that at this stage, he is confining his prayer to seek the benefit of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116 for which liberty may be given to the appellant and liberty may also be given to the appellant to approach this Court again at appropriate stage for seeking appropriate relief.
4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the appellant.
5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present appeal is disposed of with liberty as prayed for.
6. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra) , this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today, they would not take any coercive action against the appellant in the aforesaid case. It is made clear that in this regard, no application shall be entertained. November 14, 2025 Arun/- Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Avikshit Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Anurag Shukla, Bhagwati Prasad Nigam (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Awadhesh Singh .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench